WORKERS AHEAD!
You are viewing the development documentation for the Apereo CAS server. The functionality presented here is not officially released yet. This is a work in progress and will be continually updated as development moves forward. You are most encouraged to test the changes presented.
Risk-based Authentication
Risk-based authentication allows CAS to detect suspicious and seemingly-fraudulent authentication requests based on past user behavior and collected authentication events, statistics, etc. Once and after primary authentication where the principal is identified, the authentication transaction is analyzed via a number of configurable criteria and fences to determine how risky the attempt may be. The result of the evaluation step is a cumulative risk score that is then weighed against a risk threshold set by the CAS operator. In the event that the authentication attempt is considered risky well beyond the risk threshold, CAS may be allowed to take action and mitigate that risk.
In summary, the story told is:
If an authentication request is at least [X%] risky, take action to mitigate that risk.
The functionality of this feature is ENTIRELY dependent upon collected statistics and authentication events in the past. Without data, there is nothing to analyze and no risk to detect.
Note that evaluation of attempts and mitigation of risks are all recorded in the audit log.
If you need to preemptively evaluate authentication attempts based on various characteristics of the request, you may be interested in this guide instead.
A few notes to remember:
- You MUST allow and configure CAS to track and record authentication events.
- You MUST allow and configure CAS to geolocate authentication requests.
- If the selected contingency plan is to force the user into a multifactor authentication flow, you then MUST configure CAS for multifactor authentication and the relevant provider.
Configuration
Support is enabled by including the following dependency in the overlay:
1
2
3
4
5
<dependency>
<groupId>org.apereo.cas</groupId>
<artifactId>cas-server-support-electrofence</artifactId>
<version>${cas.version}</version>
</dependency>
1
implementation "org.apereo.cas:cas-server-support-electrofence:${project.'cas.version'}"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
dependencyManagement {
imports {
mavenBom "org.apereo.cas:cas-server-support-bom:${project.'cas.version'}"
}
}
dependencies {
implementation "org.apereo.cas:cas-server-support-electrofence"
}
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
dependencies {
/*
The following platform references should be included automatically and are listed here for reference only.
implementation enforcedPlatform("org.apereo.cas:cas-server-support-bom:${project.'cas.version'}")
implementation platform(org.springframework.boot.gradle.plugin.SpringBootPlugin.BOM_COORDINATES)
*/
implementation "org.apereo.cas:cas-server-support-electrofence"
}
The following settings and properties are available from the CAS configuration catalog:
cas.authn.adaptive.risk.core.threshold=0.6
The risk threshold factor beyond which the authentication event may be considered risky.
|
cas.authn.adaptive.risk.core.days-in-recent-history=30
Indicates how far back the search in authentication history must go in order to locate authentication events.
|
Configuration Metadata
The collection of configuration properties listed in this section are automatically generated from the CAS source and components that contain the actual field definitions, types, descriptions, modules, etc. This metadata may not always be 100% accurate, or could be lacking details and sufficient explanations.
Be Selective
This section is meant as a guide only. Do NOT copy/paste the entire collection of settings into your CAS configuration; rather pick only the properties that you need. Do NOT enable settings unless you are certain of their purpose and do NOT copy settings into your configuration only to keep them as reference. All these ideas lead to upgrade headaches, maintenance nightmares and premature aging.
YAGNI
Note that for nearly ALL use cases, declaring and configuring properties listed here is sufficient. You should NOT have to explicitly massage a CAS XML/Java/etc configuration file to design an authentication handler, create attribute release policies, etc. CAS at runtime will auto-configure all required changes for you. If you are unsure about the meaning of a given CAS setting, do NOT turn it on without hesitation. Review the codebase or better yet, ask questions to clarify the intended behavior.
Naming Convention
Property names can be specified in very relaxed terms. For instance cas.someProperty
, cas.some-property
, cas.some_property
are all valid names. While all
forms are accepted by CAS, there are certain components (in CAS and other frameworks used) whose activation at runtime is conditional on a property value, where
this property is required to have been specified in CAS configuration using kebab case. This is both true for properties that are owned by CAS as well as those
that might be presented to the system via an external library or framework such as Spring Boot, etc.
When possible, properties should be stored in lower-case kebab format, such as cas.property-name=value
.
The only possible exception to this rule is when naming actuator endpoints; The name of the
actuator endpoints (i.e. ssoSessions
) MUST remain in camelCase mode.
Settings and properties that are controlled by the CAS platform directly always begin with the prefix cas
. All other settings are controlled and provided
to CAS via other underlying frameworks and may have their own schemas and syntax. BE CAREFUL with
the distinction. Unrecognized properties are rejected by CAS and/or frameworks upon which CAS depends. This means if you somehow misspell a property definition
or fail to adhere to the dot-notation syntax and such, your setting is entirely refused by CAS and likely the feature it controls will never be activated in the
way you intend.
Validation
Configuration properties are automatically validated on CAS startup to report issues with configuration binding, specially if defined CAS settings cannot be recognized or validated by the configuration schema. Additional validation processes are also handled via Configuration Metadata and property migrations applied automatically on startup by Spring Boot and family.
Indexed Settings
CAS settings able to accept multiple values are typically documented with an index, such as cas.some.setting[0]=value
. The index [0]
is meant to be
incremented by the adopter to allow for distinct multiple configuration blocks.
Risk Calculation
You need to configure CAS to allow it to detect suspicious and seemingly-fraudulent authentication requests based on past user behavior and collected authentication events, statistics, etc.
See this guide for more info.
Risk Mitigation
Once an authentication attempt is deemed risky, you need to configure CAS to decide how to handle and respond to the authentication attempt.
See this guide for more info.