WORKERS AHEAD!
You are viewing the development documentation for the Apereo CAS server. The functionality presented here is not officially released yet. This is a work in progress and will be continually updated as development moves forward. You are most encouraged to test the changes presented.
JWT Secured Authorization Response Mode (JARM) - OpenID Connect Authentication
JWT Secured Authorization Response (JARM) allows for a number of strategies that allow a new JWT-based mode to encode authorization responses back to the client. This mechanism enhances the security of the standard authorization response with support for signing and optional encryption of the response. A signed response provides message integrity, sender authentication, audience restriction, and protection from mix-up attacks. Encrypting the response provides confidentiality of the response parameter values.
A relying party definition in CAS can be marked to produce JWT authorization responses:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
{
"@class": "org.apereo.cas.services.OidcRegisteredService",
"clientId": "client",
"serviceId": "https://app.example.org/redirect",
"name": "Sample",
"id": 1,
"scopes" : [ "java.util.HashSet", [ "profile", "openid" ] ],
"supportedResponseTypes": [ "java.util.HashSet", [ "code" ] ],
"responseMode": "query.jwt"
}
JWT authorization responses produced by CAS can be signed and/or encrypted. The signing and encryption strategy should quite similar to that of ID tokens or access tokens.
The following example shows the JWT claims for a successful code
authorization response:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
{
"iss": "https://sso.example.com/cas/oidc",
"aud": "client",
"exp": 1311281970,
"code": "OC-1-...",
"state": "..."
}
-
The response mode
query.jwt
causes CAS to send the authorization response as HTTP redirect to the redirect URI of the client. CAS adds the parameterresponse
containing the JWT to the query component of the redirect URI:1 2
HTTP/1.1 302 Found Location: https://app.example.org/redirect?response=eyJraWQiOiJsYWViIiwiYWxnIjoiRVMyN...
-
The response mode
fragment.jwt
causes CAS to send the authorization response as HTTP redirect to the redirect URI of the client. The authorization server adds the parameterresponse
containing the JWT to the fragment component of the redirect URI:1 2
HTTP/1.1 302 Found Location: https://app.example.org/redirect#response=eyJraWQiOiJsYWViIiwiYWxnIjoiRVMyN...
-
The response mode
form_post.jwt
causes CAS toPOST
the authorization response to the redirect URI of the client. Theresponse
parameter containing the JWT is encoded as HTML form value that is auto-submitted and thus is transmitted via the HTTPPOST
method to the client, with the result parameters being encoded in the body using theapplication/x-www-form-urlencoded
format.
Configuration
The following settings and properties are available from the CAS configuration catalog:
cas.authn.oidc.jarm.expiration=PT60S
Hard timeout to kill the JWT token and expire it. This settings supports the
|
Configuration Metadata
The collection of configuration properties listed in this section are automatically generated from the CAS source and components that contain the actual field definitions, types, descriptions, modules, etc. This metadata may not always be 100% accurate, or could be lacking details and sufficient explanations.
Be Selective
This section is meant as a guide only. Do NOT copy/paste the entire collection of settings into your CAS configuration; rather pick only the properties that you need. Do NOT enable settings unless you are certain of their purpose and do NOT copy settings into your configuration only to keep them as reference. All these ideas lead to upgrade headaches, maintenance nightmares and premature aging.
YAGNI
Note that for nearly ALL use cases, declaring and configuring properties listed here is sufficient. You should NOT have to explicitly massage a CAS XML/Java/etc configuration file to design an authentication handler, create attribute release policies, etc. CAS at runtime will auto-configure all required changes for you. If you are unsure about the meaning of a given CAS setting, do NOT turn it on without hesitation. Review the codebase or better yet, ask questions to clarify the intended behavior.
Naming Convention
Property names can be specified in very relaxed terms. For instance cas.someProperty
, cas.some-property
, cas.some_property
are all valid names. While all
forms are accepted by CAS, there are certain components (in CAS and other frameworks used) whose activation at runtime is conditional on a property value, where
this property is required to have been specified in CAS configuration using kebab case. This is both true for properties that are owned by CAS as well as those
that might be presented to the system via an external library or framework such as Spring Boot, etc.
When possible, properties should be stored in lower-case kebab format, such as cas.property-name=value
.
The only possible exception to this rule is when naming actuator endpoints; The name of the
actuator endpoints (i.e. ssoSessions
) MUST remain in camelCase mode.
Settings and properties that are controlled by the CAS platform directly always begin with the prefix cas
. All other settings are controlled and provided
to CAS via other underlying frameworks and may have their own schemas and syntax. BE CAREFUL with
the distinction. Unrecognized properties are rejected by CAS and/or frameworks upon which CAS depends. This means if you somehow misspell a property definition
or fail to adhere to the dot-notation syntax and such, your setting is entirely refused by CAS and likely the feature it controls will never be activated in the
way you intend.
Validation
Configuration properties are automatically validated on CAS startup to report issues with configuration binding, specially if defined CAS settings cannot be recognized or validated by the configuration schema. Additional validation processes are also handled via Configuration Metadata and property migrations applied automatically on startup by Spring Boot and family.
Indexed Settings
CAS settings able to accept multiple values are typically documented with an index, such as cas.some.setting[0]=value
. The index [0]
is meant to be
incremented by the adopter to allow for distinct multiple configuration blocks.